Feb 10, 2011

2nd Group Activity - Diffusion of Innovations:

By Corrine


In the “Diffusion of Innovations”, diffusion is the process by which an innovation is communicated through certain channels over time among the members of a social system. Diffusion is a special type of communication concerned with the spread of messages that are perceived as new ideas.

Therefore, four main elements can be summarized from the model of “Diffusion of Innovations”:

(1) The innovation
(2) Communication channels
(3) Time
(4) The social system (context)

According to the model, there are 5 adopter categories, or classifications of the members of a social system, they can be categorized on the basis of their innovativeness, i.e. the degree to which an individual or other unit of adoption is relatively earlier in adopting new ideas than other members of a social system.

(1) Innovators – 2.5%
(2) Early adopters – 13.5%
(3) Early majority – 34%
(4) Late majority – 34%
(5) Laggards – 16%

Early adopters are always opinion leaders, and serve as role-models for many other members of the social system. Early adopters are instrumental in getting an innovation, thus in the successful diffusion of an innovation.

Early adopters are a more integrated part of the local system than are innovators. Potential adopters look to early adopters for advice and information about the innovation. This adopter category is generally sought by change agents as a local missionary for speeding the diffusion process.

The early majority’s unique position between the very early and the relatively late to adopt makes them an important link in the diffusion process. They provide interconnectedness in the system’s interpersonal networks.

Laggards tend to be suspicious of innovations and change agents. Resistance to innovations on the part of laggards may be entirely rational from the laggard’s viewpoint, as their resources are limited and they must be certain that a new idea will not fail before they can adopt.

The model of “Diffusion of Innovations” can be applied in the Hong Kong social system. For instance, when the 3-3-4 education reform was first introduced, it took a long consultation period for the innovators to bring it to the public. The innovators were only a minority of the public as they were the top management people of the education system who innovated the change. When the 3-3-4 system was confirmed to be implemented, some early adopters put some academic programmes into trial or practice. Most people were early majority, the schools and people tended to follow the Government’s instruction and executed the reform. Later on, the late adopters followed the early majority to carry out the educational change. A minority of people was laggard as they were afraid to follow the change, they must be certain that the reform was successful before they could adopt. That’s why some people still adopt home schooling in Hong Kong as they are not assured of the effectiveness of the Hong Kong’s education system.

1 comment:

  1. Hi dear Corrine, you have already gave a very good example the adoption of 334 reform. We perhaps feel very unfamiliar with it, I searched some information about it for mainland members including me~~hehe
    In October, 2004, the Education and Manpower Bureau published a report titled “Reforming the Academic Structure for
    Senior Secondary Education and Higher Education -- Actions for Investing in the Future”, suggesting a new academic
    structure of “334” for Hong Kong, which immediately aroused great social concern and extensive public discussion on the
    issue. Based upon changes in the academic structures of Hong Kong and other parts of the world, the writer attempts to
    discuss the issues arising from the adoption of the new “334” academic structure. This article supplies valuable historical
    reference materials on the underlying principles of an academic structure, the main characteristics of various academic
    structures in other parts of the world, the recent trends of academic structures in universities in Europe, and the changes and
    reforms on the academic structures in China since the last century. It also analyses the advantages and challenges brought by
    the new structure for Hong Kong.
    Keywords
    the world’s main streams of academic structures, the generality of higher education, the new higher academic structure of
    “4 to 3”, the Bologna Manifesto on the reform of education, Europe LMD (Licence-Master-Doctorate), the new academic
    structure, the changes in academic structures in Hong Kong, the new academic structure of “3-3-4”

    For more information:
    http://edb.org.hk/HKTC/download/journal/j4/P061-068.PDF

    ReplyDelete